ReDecide
The Journal
Sunk Cost: Recognising It in Your Own Reasoning
Everyone can define the sunk cost fallacy in the abstract. Catching it live, in your own list of reasons, is the hard part. A worked continue-or-pivot example, computed with ReDecide's own pros and cons scorer, shows exactly how much one sunk-cost item can distort a result.
Satisficing vs Maximising: Why "Good Enough" Often Beats "The Best"
Maximisers search exhaustively for the best option; satisficers stop at the first one that clears their bar. A worked apartment-hunt example, computed with ReDecide's own decision matrix, shows a case where maximising finds the objectively better option — and still tends to leave the maximiser less satisfied with it.
Reversible vs Irreversible: Matching Your Decision Effort to the Real Stakes
"Match your effort to the stakes" is easy to say and hard to apply. A set of worked comparisons, computed with ReDecide's own timing planner, turns the reversibility half of that rule into an actual number of days rather than a vague impression.